🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on expanding your venture? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in an organized professional network test this week after viral posts indicated that switching their profile gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to include what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who employ online business jargon.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decline substantially.

The Process

• First, she changed her gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - like a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, stating "Each day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants encountered favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to informal experiments where the same posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and spread content based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."